The Centre for Voluntary Sector Leadership and the Voluntary Sector Studies Network held a joint event this month (December 2017) with a team of expert speakers.
Leadership is back on the agenda, following a range of influential inquiries and reports calling for strengthened leadership in and of the voluntary sector, alongside improved governance and accountability. Over the years, sector bodies like NCVO and ACEVO have ‘taken a lead’ on the issue; more recently, we have seen the King’s Fund and Clore launch new leadership development initiatives for the sector.
Yet there has traditionally been scepticism towards the concept of leadership within the sector, perhaps because it is seen as counter to notions of emancipation, anti-hierarchicalism and democratic practice prized in some accounts of the sector. Also problematically, this focus seems based on the premise that the sector needs to do better, and its leaders are not up to scratch.
This seminar aimed to examine this premise in more detail, and expose to greater scrutiny the idea that leadership is part of the solution.
Dr Alison Body, Canterbury Christ Church University, and Dr Jeremy Kendall, University of Kent
Alison Body emphasised the role of tactical social skills in commissioning relationships. She describes there is a new competitive commissioning environment that have created new rules to follow, which fuel increasing concerns over the changes in commissioning relationships. Her research identifies how voluntary organisations demonstrate agency in how they approach commissioning relationships, and by drawing on Fligstein’s field theory she illustrates how these social skills can be used as tactics to move in and across fields.
Stephanie Denning, PhD student in Geography at the University of Bristol
Stephanie Denning draws on her PhD research project that explores food poverty and hunger holidays. She discussed her role as a leader in a Make Lunch initiative and draws upon the concepts of positionality and power to illustrate the everyday experiences within the initiative. Her research uses an ethnographic approach to look at the everyday practices within the initiative, highlighting this as a beneficial methodology to observe the everyday practices of leadership within voluntary sector organisations.
Dr Jon Dean, Sheffield Hallam
Jon Dean’s presentation addressed the controversial topic of the collapse of Kids Company. He applied the theoretical concepts of charismatic leadership – drawn particularly from Max Weber’s work on sources of authority – to the former Director of Kids Company, Camila Batmanghelidjh, to unpack her traits, characteristics and role as a leader. His discussion looks at various explanations of the collapse of Kids Company, identifying different relationships, reputations, responsibilities and positions.
Candy Perry, Independent researcher
Candy Perry discussed success and failures in leadership and management focusing on the need to understand what is happening in different parts of the organisation in order to avoid leading or seeking to control changes simply from the top but thereby failing to make effective changes. She highlighted the need for a ‘whole systems’ approach, explaining through examples of five different voluntary organisations that she had supported in her consultancy work. She worked with these organisations where leaders felt paralysed into inaction through a form of action research to support learning and to help to unlock some their internal conflicts.
Dr Epaminondas Koronis (presenter) and Dr Katalin Iles, University of Westminster
Epaminondas Koronis draws on empirical data that explores patterns of leadership in charities in Greece. He describes how leadership in the voluntary sector is distinctive in this context, by arguing organisations require flexibility and more resilience to navigate this complex environment. He illustrates how leadership is complex, therefore, to unpack this it is helpful to understand the context. Various approaches to do this are through exploring narrative, storytelling and practices. Epaminondas puts forth a strong argument that a beneficial way to understand leadership is through interpreting leadership as a symbolic process.